<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Journalist Toolbox: Recycling Your Content and Creating a Living Portfolio with From The Archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/</link>
	<description>Freelance journalist, technology columnist, design hobbyist and media geek</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Blanda</title>
		<link>http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Blanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianjameskirk.com/?p=147#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Update you bum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update you bum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Haas</title>
		<link>http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianjameskirk.com/?p=147#comment-20</guid>
		<description>No, you're doing it for experience and (one hopes) pay. By all means, write every chance you get — but don't agonize unduly over what's in your clip package.

See, we assume that anything you send has had the crap edited out of it — but the fact that Publication X thought enough of you to make that effort says something to us.

Just use common sense. If you're sending clips, consider topic relevance first, prestige of publication second, and age of clip third. If you're creating an online archive, I'd organize by prestige rather than chronology. Once you're full time somewhere or develop a solid freelance track record, you can revert to chronology.

Ultimately, taking every opportunity to improve your skills while also ingratiating yourself with people who already work at the places you want to work is the surest strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you&#8217;re doing it for experience and (one hopes) pay. By all means, write every chance you get — but don&#8217;t agonize unduly over what&#8217;s in your clip package.</p>
<p>See, we assume that anything you send has had the crap edited out of it — but the fact that Publication X thought enough of you to make that effort says something to us.</p>
<p>Just use common sense. If you&#8217;re sending clips, consider topic relevance first, prestige of publication second, and age of clip third. If you&#8217;re creating an online archive, I&#8217;d organize by prestige rather than chronology. Once you&#8217;re full time somewhere or develop a solid freelance track record, you can revert to chronology.</p>
<p>Ultimately, taking every opportunity to improve your skills while also ingratiating yourself with people who already work at the places you want to work is the surest strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Wink</title>
		<link>http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Wink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianjameskirk.com/?p=147#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Ouch, y'all don't read them! Ah, I suppose that figures, but it stings a little bit, no? So am I accumulating multiple clips from the same outlet for my health...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, y&#8217;all don&#8217;t read them! Ah, I suppose that figures, but it stings a little bit, no? So am I accumulating multiple clips from the same outlet for my health&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Haas</title>
		<link>http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianjameskirk.com/?p=147#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Dirty secret, gents: We don't actually read the clips. We might glance at the first graf or two. It's pretty much whom you've written for, not what you've written. And, of course, whom you've gotten friendly with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirty secret, gents: We don&#8217;t actually read the clips. We might glance at the first graf or two. It&#8217;s pretty much whom you&#8217;ve written for, not what you&#8217;ve written. And, of course, whom you&#8217;ve gotten friendly with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nolan Rosenkrans</title>
		<link>http://www.brianjameskirk.com/2008/07/recycling-your-content-and-creating-a-living-portfolio-with-from-the-archive/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Rosenkrans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianjameskirk.com/?p=147#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I've always been told that employers don't want to see clips more than 2 years old.

In fact, I've always been told it's best not to send anything more than a year old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been told that employers don&#8217;t want to see clips more than 2 years old.</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;ve always been told it&#8217;s best not to send anything more than a year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
